Day 2… Began with reflection of yesterday’s learning over what
we individually thought was most important. We were made aware of the differences
between external motivation representing short term changes and internal motivation
implying the long-term motivations we should strive to change an aspect of how
we think, ideally our key learning should be internalised.
The keynote today was given by Dr Thomas F. DeFrantz who
spoke about ‘Dancing the Afrofuture’. For me personally, this presentation doesn’t
have much relation towards my particular practise, however I did take away some
key ideas that were presented which I am going to bullet point below:
·
Cultural divides can determine how individuals
communicate through dance.
·
In the US, teaching dance is respected for
sustainability of a working dancer. It could be a transitioning job or the dancer’s
entire career.
·
The idea of post human critique combines science
fiction and fantasy. It suggests humans will turn less human and be more focused
on being seen as strands of data to create a whole being.
·
We need to bend the ability of technology- that’s
how styles such as hip hop and jazz were created as they bent the classics.
·
Despite religion/ disabilities/ beliefs these don’t
determine your choice on what you do with your body. If you want to create art that
is entirely up to the individual as they master their thoughts.
The next talk focused on the results of a survey mapping the
dance of the African Diaspora (DAD), created by One Dance UK, using survey money
to create the results of the map and findings. London was found to be the major
hub where most respondents came from. ‘Contemporary’ was the practise
dominating the sector with over 50% participants describing their practise in
this way. The survey asked what support is most needed within the arts and funding
was the biggest desire. It was also said safe spaces were limited, especially for
those emerging dancers. There were six emerging themes that were created from
the maps results:
1.
Visibility/ Platforms – to increase the
understanding of cultural dance.
2.
Sustainability/ Funding – lack of awareness towards
the arts.
3.
Marketing/ Promotions – digital communications
and offer audience development.
4.
Education/ Training – desire from more
engagement, especially with younger individuals.
5.
Legacy/ Archive – being able to create a history
of the DAD.
6.
Knowledge/ Networks – creating collaborations.
We were then able to choose one of these themes and attend a
more intimate talk around the topic. I decided to go to the education/ training
discussion lead by Dr Funmi Adewole because I felt this would be most relevant
to my personal practise having just come out of full-time training. Here we
talked about how many educational courses in dance simply want to fill numbers
due to meeting a certain number of applications for courses to be financed. This
has led classes to being overfilled so artists aren’t getting enough attention
to perfect their work. We agreed it should maybe be more selective with its
applications which would also create a higher standard of artists. Accessibility
was highlighted as the centre of the dance world, in the UK particularly, is
London making it hard for artists who don’t live near the capital to access resources
or jobs. We also spoke about the idea of institutionalised dancers being possibly
more successful than technically sound dancers. Having a clear idea of how the
industry works could be more important to a dancer entering the competitive industry
than actually being a highly skilled dancer in one technique, highlighting how
challenging the career can be. The ideas presented here really questioned my
own training and made me thankful towards the institution in which I trained
in, The Hammond, as I felt I was provided with the essential skills to take on the
working world of a dancer.
The most interesting presentation I have attended so far had
to be this next one, held by Matthew Wyon from Wolverhampton University who is
holding research on injury and physiotherapy on hip hop and break dancers. He
commented that although dancing was often low intensity, dancers worked for
many hours (more than sportsmen) and had a higher skill range. His research found
that performing these specific styles of dance left dancers with similar
injuries to those who competed in contact sports. It was picked up that most
injuries were due to overload, mainly through difficult choreography or
fatigue. A question that was highlighted was whether dancers should push their
bodies beyond their boundaries to be able to pull off advanced tricks or if safety
should come first. In order to support his finding, Wyon has been using wearable
technologies to monitor the science of a dancer whilst they dance. This does come
with its limitations however as the equipment does affect the movement range of
the dancer, suggesting the accuracy of the results could be lower than ideal.
When comparing the results of studying dancers using this wearable technology, the
consideration of the dancers training and practise had to be accounted for. For
example, ballerinas dance for hours but have major dips in their heart rate as
they have breaks throughout the whole show. In comparison, other styles of
dance may perform a single dance which could range from half an hour to a few
minutes but may be a higher intensity. From his findings, he was able to look closely
at the way muscles move which could help in injury prevention as it can explain
the reason movements are causing alignment issues. All dancers want to achieve
the same movement, for example a double pirouette, however the movement has
different effects on different bodies due to postural placement. A selection of
dancers were picked and monitored doing a pirouette, all taught by the same
teacher. Some pulled of quadruples whereas others only managed one. Each dancer
performed it observably different through the computer watching back their turns
despite the same instruction. This technology is incredibly useful for dancers
as you are able to analyse why a specific movement isn’t working and how it can
be improved.
There was only one idea presented by Matthew Wyon that I
completely disagreed on. He suggested that dancers should work at 80% and then when
coming to performance they have reserved that extra 20% to add on their
artistry. I believe in order for dancers to look effortless and to perform to
their highest ability, they should consistently be training at 100% in order to
be the best artist they can be. I feel this suggestion is quite scientific and
in that respect I understand where this idea is coming from, but as a performer
myself, I disagree with the notion of not putting your whole energy into your daily
practise.
To end the day we were all able to watch an International Mixed
Bill Showcase. This contained six performances in total that showed off the
African culture through the very core of the conference, dance. I thoroughly enjoyed
watching the artists contrasting performances, however only a few stuck in my
mind. A dancer named Nafisah Baba showed off two solos. Her incredibly sound
technique which appeared to come from ballet/ contemporary allowed her performance
to hold great control and flow. Her movements look effortless leaving the audience
amazed at the stunning choreography she was able to perform. From the USA, Juel
D. Lane and Munir Zakee created an unusual duo of having the DJ on stage
alongside the dancer. This allowed the dancer to have more control over the
music. The reason this choreography was so interesting was the relation to the
sound and how different genres of music were used to express the dancer’s
emotions, also enhanced by the fact the dancer had a stocking covering his face
so the audience couldn’t physically see his expression. I found this very creative
and individual which is why it has stuck in my mind as a memorable piece,
highlighting the importance of music to support dance in general.
Final day of Re:Generations tomorrow- I’m excited to see what
is left to explore as well as consolidate my findings throughout this journey
of seeking new knowledge towards a different culture.